Achieving Morality Essay

The external factors play a huge role in shaping atomic number 53s conclusions. One whitethorn think that his genetic and standground history has the active influence on his actions, but in naturalism, the forcefulness of a accustomed situation has greater doctor in the choices of the person. The beatings i get goings in in the long run influences his information, decision, and religion. In his essay, The Power of Context, Malcolm Gladwell states how it is the myopic things in vitality that makes the bigger difference and in many a nonher(prenominal) aspects this is true. In Daniel Gilberts essay, Immune to Reality he talks about how human knowledge about reality is non al expressions accurate. In Oliver Sackss essay, The Minds Eye he shows how on that point argon many various learnings to view the world. So at the same condemnation, is it possible to prescribe what is veracious and ill-timed in stars conduct if on the whole the decisions are a resul t of his given situation and surroundings? Also the piety for separately soulfulness varies depending on their circumstances and science of their world. Ultimately, an haughty form of right and wrong does not exist because the context of the situation always changes, but legato it is possible to achieve an applicable standard of morals in society.Each individual has his own way of flavour at the world that is completely ludicrous when compared to the way another soulfulness does. This is perception of reality and this form is always open to discussion because the soulfulness generates this viewpoint. Each individual makes his decisions based on his perception of the world. The processes by which we generate positive views are many we pay more attention to favorable information, we surround ourselves with those who provide it, and we accept it uncritically (Gilbert 134). In many instance one start outs his own perception to wooing his way of thinking, so the individual could be in the center of his world. He seemed to regard this loss of optical imagery as a prerequisite for the to the full development, the heightening, of his other senses (Sacks 304). most people see worthy blind as unfortunate event, but match to this person it sufficeed him to improve his other senses. The tabloids dubbed Goetz the subway vigilance man and the death wish shooter (Gladwell 153). Rather than see Goetz as a lunatic the wisespapers depicted him as a hero.So this shows the difference in perception between people and how it varies from individuals. Importantly since each persons perception varies it is hard to claim whose perception is right or wrong because ultimately is on that point a right perception of the world that e reallybody should be following? Even when viewing a word-painting everybody has their own interpretation of the art. No one claims on that point is only one right perception kind of the diametrical perceptions are entirely different approaches towards looking at the world. It was simply inconceivable that approximatelyone could cast a gun on nearone else on the subway and be called a hero for it. (Gladwell 154) shows how different viewpoints affect the verdicts of a situation. A hero to some people major power be a scoundrel to others and it is hard to claim who is the right hero. The difference in subjectivity among people will always create a discrepancy of opinions among people. Since a variety of perception exists, then is it possible to have a entire set and stone right and wrong rules in life?The context of a given way out plays a huge role in decision making the morality of the event. Morality is very much depended on the background information of the event. It is very hard to dictate the morality of an issue without seeing the bigger picture. Most people might see stealing as a wrong act, but what if someone render a piece of bread in indian lodge to make sure he does not betray from starvat ion, is that put away a wrong act? In a situation corresponding that one might feel sympathetic to that poor fellow and plausibly will see stealing as sensitive in that given situation. We do not slang that our views will change (Gilbert 135), the idea of morality varies on the situation because the context of the event directly affects morality. blindness now becomes for him a dark paradoxical gift. This is not just compensation, but a whole new order, a new temper of human world (Sacks 305), in many aspects blind people do not see their condition as a curse or burden rather a different approach towards living and for most comprehend people it might be hard to agnise and accept this approach. That at that place are instances where you brook take normal people from uncorrupted schools and happy families and advanced neighborhoods and powerfully affect their behavior merely by changing the immediate dilate of their situation (Gladwell 162) this shows how the little deta ils of an event plays huge role in the outcomes of an event. Essentially, context of a situation is what dictates morality and it is going to be almost unattainable to label morality as set and stone as something like the Ten Commandments because the context always changes.Even though the standards of morality vary according to the situation there are some aspects of morality that one subconsciously accepts. Some ethics are universally considered wrong and ones estimation without even one knowing already knows that some choices are not right. That is why the mind tends to usually question the choices one makes. When we cook facts, we are similarly unaware of why we are doing it, and this turns out to be a good thing, because deliberate attempts to generate positive views (Gilbert 134), subconsciously to some extend individuals are aware of the morality nookie an action and this will help individuals to make their decisions wisely.To what shutting are we our experiences, our re actions ruled, predetermined, by our brains, and to what extend do we shape our own brains (Sacks 303), There are some emotions and judgments that are simply preinstalled in ones mind which assist an individual in making choices that are difficult. After a while the bad guys wised up and began to leave their weapons home and pay their fares (Gladwell 157) this shows how there is a consciousness inside individuals that helps in guiding with decision making. When making a choice that might inspect pain to us or others ones mind will usually try to enkindle against that decision. That is why the idea of taking an innocent persons life is universally seen as a wrongful act in societies. Therefore, there is a sense of unconscious morality that lies within the paddy wagon of most individuals.Achieving a complete form of morality is a very idealistic thought because very much its not possible. There are continuously many ways of perceiving morality and it would be impossible to set a standard that would suit all the time. Too often people with sight come int see anything (Sacks 310). There are separate that even ones eye sometimes fuckingnot capture meaning that sometimes its simply not possible to account for all the possibilities. The do good of all this unconscious cookery is that it works, but the embody is that it makes us strangers to ourselves (Gilbert 135). People sometime engage in activities without being aware of the magnitude of the situation. They are both(prenominal) based on the premise that an epidemic can be reversed, can be tipped, by tinkering with the minuscularest details of the immediate environment (Gladwell 157) the intensity of the situation has a huge influence on the decision of the individual. due(p) to all this, perceiving morality completely would be very difficult.Also having a undefiled morality would imply quad knowledge which humans do not possess. As an individual one is peculiar(a) at what he observes at a given t ime and there are limitations for each individual in this world. However, through the perceptions of many individuals, people will be able to come up with a smash understanding of morality. Even with the limitations each individual has a small understanding of morality in the back of his head. Essentially, when all these understanding that are possessed by individuals are combined then a satisfactory set of standards will be formed that can accompany most situations. The collective effort of people will help to generate a reform set of morality that will help in creating a peaceful environment for people to live in. That is why it is important to have many different perceptions of morality because they all eventually lead to creating detach rules that will be suitable for the well-being of a society.Despite not being able to have an absolute morality with infallible accuracy and with infinite knowledge, an applicable method of sensing morality is still practical. Individuals lac k the ability to have a perfect morality because for one to acquire it in completion one needs to possess infinite issue forth of knowledge. Despite this back drop each individual innately has the ability to know morality in small parts and therefore combining the small parts of every individual will help to achieve a suitable set of codes. The differences in perception between people only aids to benefit humans in portraying a better understanding of morality. That is why it is important that there are different types of perceptions because if there was only one view then a very limited and narrow minded principle would be prevailing in the world. The different pathways of thinking done by people finally leads to achieving a suitable mode of morality. An absolute form of morality will never be possible in this imperfect world, however, that does not mean accomplishing a reasonable standard is impossible.